Wednesday, September 29, 2010
Week 3 NFL Results and ATS Numbers
This week was much better than the last. We again finished 3-2 in picks, but we were much better where it really counts--units. Our big winner was the Packers/Bears under for 4 units, followed by 3 units each on the Colts and Titans/Giants under. Our losers were the pathetic Lions (thankfully, just 1 unit) and the surprisingly overmatched Dolphins (3 units). As an added plus, we saved six bucks, since there was no contest winner (thanks again to the two of you who played).
Week 3 Record:
3 wins, 2 losses
10 units won, 4 units lost= +6 units
Year-to-Date:
6 wins, 4 losses
17 units won, 11 units lost= +6 units
We might have had a good weekend, but the biggest winners this week were (once again) the underdogs. Just like last week, favorites had a hard time covering, going only 5-11 ATS (18-28-2 year-to-date). Is this a trend? As always, it is until it isn't. Totals were again more even, with 9 going over, 7 under (22-25-1 YTD).
We'll see you on Saturday, when we'll discuss whether the Bears can once again get it done in prime time...
Saturday, September 25, 2010
Week 3 NFL TV Picks
The pick: Lions +11.5 (1 unit) (Total is 43)
-
The pick: UNDER 43.5 (3 units) (Spread is New York -3)
-
The pick: Colts -6 (3 units) (Total is 47.5)
-
- So far this year, the Pack has averaged 30.5 "points for" (PF) and 13.5 "points against" (PA); the Bears have averaged 23.0 PF and 17.0 PA. These raw numbers would suggest an approximate final score in this game of Green Bay 24, Chicago 18 (with an over/under of 42). The actual spread is Green Bay -3. The actual total is 46.
- Through two games, the Pack offense has averaged 111.5 yards on the ground and 211.0 in the air. The Bears defense has given up an average of only 28.0 on the ground, but a whopping 261.0 passing. The Bears have run for only 69.5 yards a game, but thrown for 316.0 per. The Pack have given up 137.0 rushing, 116.5 passing.
What do these numbers tell us? NOTHING, really--that's why they call it "gambling." But to try to make our guess an educated one, let's assume that the numbers suggest the following:
- Even though the statement has as much truth as your average 9/11 conspiracy theory, the great sage Lovie Smith has told us for years that "the Chicago Bears get off the bus running." Based on the numbers above, there's no reason to doubt that the Bears will be tempted to work out their anemic rushing skills against the Pack's woeful run defense. On the flip side, the Pack's stingy pass D will probably scare the Bears away from giving Jay Cutler too many IA's (interception attempts). (Then again, the Pack D hasn't exactly been tested, having garnered those stats, in order, against Michael Vick, then the Bills).
- As much as Lovie will be looking to run, Aaron Rodgers must be positively SALIVATING at the prospect of throwing against the Bears. But again, the Pack has posted their numbers against the Eagles and Bills, while the Bears have faced one really good quarterback in Tony Romo and a half-game of another good quarterback, Matt Stafford.
Based on all of the above, we can see why the line is where it is, rather than being at the suggested number of Pack -9. But this early in the season, with two teams that look fairly evenly matched, we're going to stay away from a 3-point spread--a field goal could decide this one either way. So we're going to predict that the Bears run with some success, the Pack passes with some success (though less than they've had), and a tight game finishes closer to the suggested total of 42 than the actual total of 46. One more piece of info: combined, these two teams have gone under the total 3 out of 4 times.
-
The pick: UNDER 46 (4 units) (Spread is Green Bay -3)
-
As always, we'll track our record by picks AND units. Boa sorte!
Monday, September 20, 2010
Week 2 NFL Results and ATS Numbers
Once again, the Saints prove unable to cover, allowing the surprisingly spirited and competent Niners to stay in the game until the bitter end. As a result, we finished 3-2 in our picks (getting it right on the Dolphins, Bears and Giants/Colts total; going the wrong way on the Patriots and Saints). However, the name of the game is "units"--which is where the Saints hurt us. Having called the Saints pick a four-unit game, we finish the week with an unimpressive 7 units won and 7 lost, for a net of 0 units. (Less 7/10ths of a unit, if you flew to Vegas to bet, of course.)
Week 2 Record:
3 wins, 2 losses
7 units won, 7 units lost=0 units. (We'll keep a year-to-date total on picks and units as the season progresses).
Overall in the NFL, Sunday was the "Day of the Dog" (as was Monday, unfortunately for us). Favorites this week were 5-10-1 ATS, making them 13-17-2 year to date*. Over/unders were more evenly distributed, with overs going 9-7, making them 13-18-1 year to date (that number is skewed by the fact that a whopping 11 of the 16 games in week one were under the total).
Thanks for stopping by, and we appreciate the comments and e-mails. If you have thoughts/theories/picks/suggestions/corrections, please feel free to leave them in the comments for everyone's benefit. We'll be back on Saturday to pick all of the televised Week 3 games--and to try to figure out whether the Bears are for real...
*Spreads always quoted from http://www.scoresandodds.com/
Saturday, September 18, 2010
Week 2 NFL TV Picks
Here we go:
1. Miami +5.5 over MINNESOTA (One unit): Favre could be a monster at home, or his arm could fall off in the first quarter--hard to tell...
2. Bears +7 over DALLAS (Four units): It's tough to pick the Bears over anyone, but the Cowboys are going to have considerable difficulty covering by a touchdown with Romo on his back all day.
3. New England -3 over NY JETS (Three units): The Pats may not put up another 38 this week, but whatever they do score will be a LOT more than the Jets do.
4. Giants at COLTS OVER 48 (Two units): This year could be the end of the Colts dynasty...or it might not be....but there's probably gonna be some scoring in this one.
5. New Orleans -6 over SAN FRANCISCO (Four units): Unless 1980's versions of Montana, Rice and Craig step out of a time machine on Monday and suit up, this game spells B-L-O-W-O-U-T.
Every week, we'll track our record by picks AND units. Good luck!